Empowering Your Success: Our Diverse Legal Expertise

Yes, Sahil Aeron Law Firm offers free consultations to discuss your legal needs and explore potential solutions. This allows us to understand your situation and determine how we can best assist you.

You can schedule a consultation by calling us at +91 8853775377, emailing us at advocatesahilaeron@gmail.com, or filling out the contact form on our website.

While it’s not mandatory, bringing any relevant documents related to your case can be helpful during the consultation. We can discuss this further when you schedule your appointment.

We pride ourselves on our commitment to client service, personalized attention, and achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients. Our team of experienced and highly skilled legal professionals is dedicated to providing strategic and effective legal representation.

The timeframe for resolving a legal case can vary depending on the nature of the case and the court system involved. We will provide you with an estimated timeline based on our experience with similar cases. However, it’s important to understand that unforeseen circumstances can sometimes affect the timeline. We will keep you updated throughout the process.

Clear communication is essential. We will provide you with regular updates on the progress of your case and ensure you understand all developments. You can also contact us at any time with questions or concerns.

Yes, Sahil Aeron Law Firm represents clients throughout India. We leverage technology and have a network of contacts to effectively manage cases in different locations.

Sahil Aeron Law Firm offers a comprehensive range of legal services in various practice areas pertaining to Corporate & Commercial, Taxation, Intellectual Property, Real Estate, Employment, Dispute Resolution, and Individual & Family Law. You can explore our practice areas in more detail on our website.

The cost of legal services can vary depending on the complexity of your case, the time involved, and the specific services required. During your free consultation, we will discuss your case and provide you with a transparent fee structure.

Yes. But with some conditions. Can be signed through spouse / parents / immediate family member.

Yes. But not for leading evidence. With technological advancements it might be streamlined in future.

Such benefits are listed in the maternity benefits act, 1961. Such benefits are available to employees <gender neutral with varying benefits> under public as well as private sector entities in India. All women who are pregnant, adopting a child, or experiencing a miscarriage are eligible for maternity leave in India.

No. There is difference in complainant and informant. Anyone can inform an offence to the police.

Yes. It is permissible under the scheme of evidence act, information technology act and allied rules.

Steps are

• cheque presented for honoring
• cheque dishonoured
• cheque return memo received
• legal notice by drawee within 30 days
• criminal complaint after 15 days and within 45 days from legal notice delivered.

No.

In the case of Shanu (supra) the learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court after taking note of the provision of the said Act as well as Section 437 of Code held that “it is clear that the J.F.C.M.’s Court has got jurisdiction to grant bail to the persons accused of the offence punishable under any of the sub-cls. (i) to (xv) of sub-s. (1) of S. 3 of the Act.” While delivering the said decision the learned Single Judge after taking note of Section 437 of Criminal Procedure Code has observed that “the Magistrate is competent to release an accused, either appeared or brought before him, if the offence alleged is not punishable with death or imprisonment for life.” Similarly in Ram Bharoshi’s case (supra) the learned Single Judge of Allahabad High Court held that ” it is abundantly clear that there is no prohibition on a Magistrate to grant bail in a Sessions triable case, unless it is punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and it is absolutely necessary that the Magistrate give up the erroneous practice of refusing to consider or grant bails in such cases where there is no prohibition under the Code of Criminal Procedure.” While delivering the said Judgment it was observed thus “13. There are a number of offences in the Penal code which are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life, but they are triable by the Court of Sessions, where the Magistrates invariably refuse bail, because they entertain a wrong notion that they are disentitled to grant bails in such cases, even if the case is one where bail ought to have been granted on merits. This approach is also in the teeth of a Division Bench decision of this Court, Vijay Kumar and ors. V. State of U.P. and Ors.

The result of this unhealthy practice is that a person against whom an FIR is lodged relating to any Sessions triable offence, which on a plain reading appears to be a case of false or malicious prosecution, uncorroborated by any independent material, the accused is left at the mercy of the police, in whose favour the Magistrate has virtually abdicated his jurisdiction. An accused may have to remain in jail for some time before his bail application is heard and granted by the Sessions Court, after the Magistrate’s routine rejection of his prayer for bail even in those minor Sessions triable offences where there may be no need for taking an accused in custody for the purpose of investigation, or where palpably he appears to have been implicated falsely, and there are no other attendant circumstances disentitling the accused from an order of bail.

Bombay High Court

Mr. Sanjay Narhar Malshe vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 March, 2005 Equivalent citations: 2005 crilj 2984

Bench: R Khandeparkar, P Kakade

1. Rule. By consent the rule is made returnable forthwith.
2. A question of law, important and interesting which is sought to be raised in this Petition relates to the powers of the Judicial Magistrate in respect of the grant or refusal of the bail to accused persons in cases which are exclusively triable either by the Sessions Courts or Special Courts established under a special statute.
3. Initially the Writ Petition was filed challenging the FIR being C.R. No.3014 of 2005 register at the Jail Road Police Station, Solapur. However, considering the fact that charge-sheet in the matter has already been filed by the Investigating Agency, reserving his right to dispute about the insufficiency of the materials to frame the charge against him, the Petitioner has restricted the challenge to the extent of the point which is sought to be raised as noted above.
4. Few facts relevant for the decision are that the services of one Rajendra Patil, who was the employee of the Petitioner’s company came to be terminated on 20.11.2002. The Petitioner on or about 26.8.2004 lodged a complaint with the Commissioner of Police, Solapur against Shri Jawahar Chavan, Rajendra Patil and some others that he was being pressurised for re-employment of said Rajendra Patil and further that he was also being threatened in that regard. The police authorities arrested some people including Jawahar Chavan, Rajendra Patil pursuant to the said complaint. The complaint also came to be filed on 4.2.205 against Zopadpatti Sanghatana, Solapur by the company of the Petitioner. Meanwhile, a complaint came to be filed on 26.8.2004 against the Petitioner accusing the Petitioner having used abusive language against one Smt. Nanda Bansode as well as the complainant Chandrakant Raut on 25.8.2004. Thereupon the Petitioner moved for an anticipatory bail, and by an Order dated 18.2.2005, the same was rejected by the learned Sessions Judge, Solapur. The Petitioner thereupon filed an anticipatory bail application being Criminal Application No.1417 of 2005 in this Court and the same was disposed of by an Order dated 4.3.2005 while reserving the right of the Petitioner to challenge the FIR. Consequently the present Petition has been filed. In the course of the hearing of the Petition it was revealed that the charge-sheet has already been filed. Thereupon by reserving the right to raise necessary objection before the concerned Court about insufficiency of the materials to frame the charge, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner has restricted the challenge in the Petition to the extent of the petitioner’s right to secure the bail even in the course of committal proceedings.
5. For the reasons stated above, therefore, the petition partly succeeds. Meanwhile the Magistrate while committing the proceedings consequent to the filing of the charge-sheet is expected to exercise his discretion judiciously in relation to power to grant or refuse the bail to the petitioner in case an application for bail is filed by the petitioner and to pass an appropriate order in that regard in accordance with the provisions of law bearing in mind the observations made herein above on the point of jurisdiction of the Magistrate to entertain and decide such bail application.

You can file for divorce after one year of marriage if both parties to marriage agree to it. Contested divorce: if one party seeks a contested divorce (where both spouses do not agree to divorce), there are conditions where law allows filing of divorce before one year from date of marriage.

What is the time-period after first motion divorce decree within which the second motion should be filed?

The law provides that the second motion divorce petition should be filed within 06 months from the date of decree of first motion. However, there are judicial pronouncements interpreting it otherwise interpreting that if either party wishes to withdraw consent given in first motion divorce, it can be done in 06 months from the date of passing of first motion divorce decree.

No.

No.

A police officer to put an individual under arrest has to sufficiently state in writing and inform the arrested person – grounds of arrest as well as reasons of arrest.

Any member of the Hindu Undivided Family unless barred by law / person of same lineage / adopted child.

An individual who receives a legal right to ancestral property by birth. A coparcener is also a member of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and can call for the division of ancestral property.

A contract where insured is indemnified of the covered losses in stipulated conditions.

Rights of accused of meeting with lawyer and giving statement in front of a lawyer.

Parole is a form of early release of a prison inmate where the prisoner agrees to abide by behavioural conditions, including checking-in with their designated parole officers, or else they may be rearrested and returned to prison.

Unlike parole, furlough is seen as a matter of right for a prisoner, to be granted periodically irrespective of any reason, and merely to enable the prisoner to retain family and social ties, and to counter the ill-effects of prolonged time spent in prison.

Probate proceedings involve process to get a will authenticated / proved by order of a court of law.

The court/judge may modify / relax the conditions on request or may remand the accused to judicial custody for failure to comply the bail conditions.